Amy Stevens vs Elicia Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kim's recent second serve performance is stronger than Stevens', with Kim winning 25% of second serve points compared to Stevens' 18.18%. Could this give Kim an advantage? Yes, as second serve performance is crucial.
• Stevens has a significant edge in returning opponents' second serves, winning 50% of points, while Kim only manages 10%. Is return proficiency a game-changer here? It could be, especially against weaker second serves.
• In return games against the first serve, Kim edges out Stevens slightly with 24% against 22.22%. This narrow difference might impact match dynamics but not decisively.
• When under pressure, Kim demonstrates superior resilience by saving 44.44% of breakpoints, compared to Stevens' 33.33%. Is this indicative of greater mental toughness? Possibly, especially during critical game moments.
• Their recent match win percentages reveal Kim's dominance, with an 80% success rate over the last year compared to Stevens' 40%. Does this reflect their overall current form? Likely, as match victories build confidence.
• Kim performs best on Grass, whereas Stevens prefers Hard courts, both having inconsistent records on their respective best surfaces. Does surface preference matter here? It depends on the match location.
• Both players have mostly competed at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, with Kim achieving an 80% win rate versus Stevens' 40%. Does playing at similar levels make comparisons fair? Yes, their experience levels are evenly matched.
• Kim's opponents have been ranked on average at 0, whereas Stevens has faced opponents with an average rank of 89.9. Could Stevens' experience against tougher opposition be an advantage? It might enhance tactical acumen, though Kim's perfect deciding set record suggests adaptability.
• Neither player has converted a breakpoint in recent matches, making this an area for both to improve. Will initial break point conversations set the match pace? Yes, as breaking serve can shift momentum significantly.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

Assessing the players' recent performances, Kim's superior second serve effectiveness and breakpoint defense suggests a slight edge in maintaining service games.

Stevens' ability to exploit second serve return plays could counterbalance by potentially creating more return opportunities, but inconsistency in overall match wins hints at possible fragility under pressure.

Despite Stevens facing better-ranked opponents, Kim's impressive record in deciding sets and overall match wins suggest a stronger ability to close out matches under duress.

Considering these factors, while both have their strengths, Kim appears more likely to secure a victory in this upcoming encounter due to a balanced mix of service game resilience and competitive form.